Using the early years pupil premium to strengthen practice and equity

Publication date

11 May 2026

Author

  • Dr Julian Grenier CBE (he/him)

    Senior content and engagement manager (early years) – Education Endowment Foundation

Would you like to book one of our guests as a speaker, consultant or trainer?

This article and podcast episode explore how the early years pupil premium (EYPP) can be used to strengthen practice and promote greater equity across the early childhood community. Drawing on research and professional experience, they reflect on why relationships with families matter, what evidence tells us about effective use of funding, and how a focus on high-quality provision can benefit all children—particularly those facing disadvantage. They also consider the importance of professional judgement, teamwork and sustained approaches to improvement in creating meaningful and lasting impact.

Understanding the purpose and potential of EYPP

The early years pupil premium (EYPP) offers an important opportunity for the early childhood community to make a meaningful difference to children’s lives. At its core, EYPP is additional funding for providers working with children aged two, three and four whose families may be experiencing economic disadvantage, or who have experienced care or adoption. Yet, despite its potential, awareness and use of EYPP remains uneven across the profession.

In this article, I want to reflect on what EYPP is, why it matters, and—most importantly—how we might use it in ways that genuinely support children’s learning, development and wellbeing.

Starting with relationships and understanding

Accessing EYPP begins with knowing families well. This can sometimes feel uncomfortable. Conversations about financial circumstances may seem intrusive, particularly when educators are working hard to build trust. However, these conversations are not about curiosity for its own sake; they are about ensuring children receive the support they are entitled to.

Strong, respectful relationships with families create the conditions where these discussions can happen naturally. When families understand that EYPP funding can directly benefit their child—and the wider group—they are far more likely to engage. Trust, in this sense, becomes both the foundation and the mechanism for equity.

Why EYPP matters: the bigger picture

The rationale for EYPP is grounded in a well-established body of research: child poverty is associated with poorer outcomes in health, early learning and later attainment. This is not about blaming families, nor about adopting deficit narratives. Many families provide rich, nurturing environments despite significant challenges.

However, at a population level, the pattern is clear. If we are serious about creating a fairer system, additional support must be directed towards those children who are most likely to face barriers. EYPP is one part of that wider effort.

Importantly, early intervention works. High-quality early years provision can have a transformative impact, particularly for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. EYPP gives us a practical tool to act on that knowledge.

Moving beyond resources: what really makes a difference

A common instinct is to spend EYPP on additional resources or experiences targeted at individual children. While this is understandable, the evidence suggests that the most significant impact comes not from what we buy, but from what we do.

High-quality interactions, sustained shared thinking, and skilled teaching are the key drivers of children’s progress. Investment in professional development—such as sustained programmes that strengthen educators’ practice—has been shown to improve outcomes for all children, with particularly strong benefits for those eligible for EYPP .

This presents a powerful shift in thinking. Rather than isolating EYPP as something “extra” for a few children, we can use it to strengthen the overall quality of provision. In doing so, we create environments where all children thrive, and those who need the most support benefit the most.

Balancing universal quality with targeted support

This does not mean that individual needs should be overlooked. Some children will require more focused support alongside improvements in overall quality.

For example, children with less experience of back-and-forth conversation or shared reading may benefit from targeted interventions, such as additional time with an educator for shared book reading. In such cases, using EYPP to support staffing or access to high-quality texts can be entirely appropriate.

The key is professional judgement. Educators must draw on both research evidence and their deep knowledge of children and families to decide how best to allocate resources.

Working as a team: a whole-setting approach

Effective use of EYPP is not the responsibility of one individual. It requires a shared commitment across the whole team.

The Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) planning tool has been developed to support this process, encouraging teams to reflect together on priorities, approaches and impact. One of its central messages is that change is most effective when everyone is involved from the outset. When educators feel

ownership over decisions, they are more likely to sustain and embed them in practice .

This collaborative approach also supports ongoing reflection. Using EYPP effectively is not a one-off decision but a continuous process of planning, reviewing and adapting.

Thinking about impact in meaningful ways

Measuring impact in the early years is complex. Not all outcomes can—or should—be reduced to numbers. However, this does not mean that impact cannot be understood.

Where appropriate, structured tools (such as language assessments) can help identify children who may need additional support and track progress over time. Equally important is observational assessment: understanding what children can do, what they are learning, and how they are engaging.

Focusing on key concepts—such as children’s developing communication, or their understanding of early mathematical ideas—can provide meaningful indicators of progress. These are not narrow outcomes but foundational aspects of learning that support children’s longer-term development.

Rethinking school readiness

Few terms generate as much debate as “school readiness”. It can be interpreted in many ways, sometimes narrowly.

Research suggests that strong provision does not separate children’s social and emotional development from their cognitive learning. Settings that support children’s confidence, relationships and independence also tend to support their communication and early mathematics effectively.

Rather than focusing on a limited definition of readiness, it may be more helpful to think in terms of holistic quality. This includes:

  • warm, responsive relationships
  • secure routines and environments
  • rich opportunities for play and interaction
  • thoughtful support for communication and early learning

In this sense, readiness is not a checklist but a reflection of a child’s overall experience.

Towards greater equity in early childhood

There remains a persistent gap in outcomes between children from different socioeconomic backgrounds. EYPP is one way the early childhood community can respond to this challenge.

Encouragingly, there is growing investment, stronger evidence about what works, and a shared commitment across the profession. There are also many examples of settings and communities where children thrive, even in the face of disadvantage.

The task ahead is to build on this knowledge: to use EYPP not as an isolated funding stream, but as part of a wider, thoughtful approach to improving quality, strengthening practice, and supporting every child.

🎧 Hear us delve deeper into this topic by listening to the podcast episode

See the YouTube video below ⬇️ or click on the link at the top of this article

Key takeaways

  • Building strong, trusting relationships with families is essential to accessing EYPP and ensuring it benefits children meaningfully.
  • EYPP should be understood as part of a wider commitment to equity, recognising the impact of socioeconomic disadvantage on children’s learning, development and wellbeing.
  • The most effective use of EYPP focuses on improving what educators do—through high-quality interactions and sustained professional development—rather than on purchasing additional resources.
  • Strengthening the overall quality of provision benefits all children, with the greatest gains often seen for those eligible for EYPP.
  • Targeted support remains important for some children and should be guided by careful professional judgement and deep knowledge of individual needs.
  • A whole-team approach is key, with shared understanding, collaboration and collective ownership underpinning effective decision-making.
  • Meaningful impact can be understood through a combination of thoughtful observation, professional insight and, where appropriate, structured assessment approaches.
  • Children’s development should be viewed holistically, with social, emotional and cognitive aspects seen as interconnected rather than separate.
  • Long-term, sustained approaches to improvement are more effective than one-off initiatives, requiring ongoing reflection, adaptation and commitment.
  • EYPP presents a valuable opportunity to narrow gaps in outcomes and support all children to thrive within a high-quality, inclusive early childhood environment.

Critical considerations

  • How confident do we feel in initiating conversations with families about EYPP, and what supports might strengthen this?
  • In what ways does our current use of EYPP prioritise what educators do, rather than what is purchased?
  • How are we balancing whole-setting improvements with targeted support for individual children?
  • To what extent are all team members involved in decisions about EYPP, and how might this be strengthened?
  • How do we define and observe meaningful impact in our setting beyond measurable outcomes?
  • What does “quality” look like in our context, and how does this shape our understanding of children’s development and wellbeing?

References & further reading

Education Endowment Foundation, 2025. The EEF Guide to the Early Years Pupil Premium. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/early-years/pupil-premium Date accessed: 6th May 2026

Education Endowment Foundation, N.D. Early Years Pupil Premium Planning tool. Available at: https://d2tic4wvo1iusb.cloudfront.net/production/content/EYPP_planning-tool_v.1.5.1.pdf Date accessed: 6th May 2026

This article and episode is in partnership with

Watch the full podcast episode

About the author

  • Senior content and engagement manager (early years) – Education Endowment Foundation

    Dr Julian Grenier is the Senior Content and Engagement Manager – Early Years at the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF).

    He is a member of the Department for Education’s Expert Advisory Group for Inclusion, the editorial board of Impact, the journal of the Chartered College of Teaching, and a trustee of the charity Thrive at Five.

    Before joining the EEF, he was the headteacher of Sheringham Nursery School and Children’s Centre in Newham, East London. During that time, he was a National Leader of Education and was also the Director of East London Research School.

    Julian was awarded a CBE for services to Early Years Education in 2022.

    View all posts

You might also be interested in...

Follow us and share your voice